<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GWT an innovative framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webmoli.com/2009/05/19/gwt-an-innovative-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webmoli.com/2009/05/19/gwt-an-innovative-framework/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://webmoli.com/2009/05/19/gwt-an-innovative-framework/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmoli.com/?p=480#comment-633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. I&#039;ve been using gwt on my own since the beginning and I love it. At work, I&#039;m just starting into a flex product. It has a very similar concept. However the approach is to use xml to describe the components and AS3 for the programming and runs in the browser via the flash plugin or as a desktop app on AIR. I think it&#039;s a bit clunkier binding the two together and I prefer the gwt approach (treating everything as classes within programming portion). Unfortunately Adobe still has the leg up on both the professional look and sockets/data push from the server.

Hopefully html5 gets put in there and websockets eventually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I&#8217;ve been using gwt on my own since the beginning and I love it. At work, I&#8217;m just starting into a flex product. It has a very similar concept. However the approach is to use xml to describe the components and AS3 for the programming and runs in the browser via the flash plugin or as a desktop app on AIR. I think it&#8217;s a bit clunkier binding the two together and I prefer the gwt approach (treating everything as classes within programming portion). Unfortunately Adobe still has the leg up on both the professional look and sockets/data push from the server.</p>
<p>Hopefully html5 gets put in there and websockets eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

